...that deal with pure data
You are not logged in.
yop, I understand now. that's really a great job. Particulary with all your audioloops :D
Offline
first off let me say this patch is killer and i'm having an awesome time toying around with it! i'm very new to PD and hoping i'll be able to make something remotely close to your patches eventually.
i was wondering some more about what hummm said concerning tempos and the loops i introduce--for some reason, even when i adjust the bpm to what the loop actually is, i can't seem to get the loop to sound right.
i guess i'm basically just wondering if there's a way to get the loops to sounds appropriate, because what i'm really hoping to do w/this is patch is establish the original loopand then deconstruct it/add other loops, etc. don't know if this makes sense or if there's an answer, but let me know what you all think!
thanks again for sharing a very sweet patch!
Offline
hi, i am hardoff. but now i am 'mod' because i terminate the spam from this forum.
are you using 44.1khz samples? i think this patch is hardcoded only to run at that rate.
however, if the problems you get with audio are little pulses on every beat, then that's due to the click-removal system. it would be possible to bypass that system while the sample plays back normally, but it would require a fair bit of work.
Offline
mod wrote:
hi, i am hardoff. but now i am 'mod' because i terminate the spam from this forum.
So now we finally now you really are a shapeshifter...
Offline
hardoff, thanks for the response! and sorry mine comes so late. checking the samples, they are all def. 44.1khz and its looking like the click removal may be the issue-the rate problem is more apparent on samples with relatively higher gain/waveforms with more clipping.
out of curiosity though, what's your process for sampling? ive just essentially been cutting samples w/recycle & exporting them. maybe the issue lies somewhere in that?
Offline
J5 wrote:
looking like the click removal may be the issue-the rate problem is more apparent on samples with relatively higher gain/waveforms with more clipping.
yep, that would be the effect of the click-removal. you'll also notice it on more pure tones and bass sounds than on drums and noisy stuff.
J5 wrote:
out of curiosity though, what's your process for sampling? ive just essentially been cutting samples w/recycle & exporting them. maybe the issue lies somewhere in that?
i cut all mine up in peak audio (mac). any sound editor would do the same job though. i doubt your recycle exports will be any trouble.
Offline
ill start keeping that in mind as i start dealing with more samples. thanks again for all the help! J5
Offline
really nice patch there hardoff
EDIT:im gonna try out and see if this patch would work in PDvst too,that would be KILLER
Last edited by S-N-S (2009-06-14 13:29:02)
Offline
hi hardoff
i tried to replace the samples in the audioloops folder with my own,but get errors,i noticed the samples you used is .aiff files,does the patch "only"support those?or can i also use .mp3s and .wav??
i also need to figure out a way to retrig samples with keys on my midi keyborad,instead of the keys on the computer keyboard,is that possible??
Offline
.wav should be ok i think? mp3 definitely not. probably only works properly with 16bit, 44.1khz stereo files.
it would be totally possible to do midi. you can get midi in by [notein] i think.
then open the subpatch called [keyboard-leys] or something like that, and fidn the send names for each effect, and join them to the midi output instead of keyboard output.
Offline
nice i will try to dissect your patch,if its ok with you
i think i can learn alot about PD from your patch:)
Offline
still have to dissect this patch,i hope i will get some time soon
Offline